Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Investigating the foraging ecology and trophic interactions of threatened marine predators is critical to assess how community changes due to anthropogenic activities will affect predator–prey relationships. Two species of threatened coastal dolphins, the Indian Ocean humpback dolphin (Sousa plumbea) and the Indo‐Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops aduncus), occur off Nosy Be, north‐western Madagascar, in a region where artisanal fisheries are ecologically and socioeconomically important. Here, we investigated the feeding ecology of these two coastal dolphins and their trophic interactions with four other odontocetes using bulk stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis (δ¹³C andδ¹⁵N). Humpback dolphins had significantly enrichedδ¹³C values, reflecting a preference for coastal/benthic prey. Bottlenose dolphins had a broader isotopic niche, suggesting a broader range of prey and foraging habitats. The overlap in isotopic niche of all six odontocete species was limited, indicating partitioning of resources and habitats. Bayesian mass‐balance isotopic mixing models revealed that humpback dolphins forage primarily on reef planktivores (38.9%) and inner reef mesopredators (20.5%), while bottlenose dolphins had a broader diet, including reef‐associated (15%–32%) and pelagic prey (12%–23%). Our study reveals that the reliance on inshore prey by humpback dolphins may place them in competition with coastal fisheries. 

Predicting the responses of animals to environmental changes is a fundamental goal of ecology and is necessary for conservation and management of species. While most studies focus on relatively gradual changes, extreme events may have lasting impacts on populations. Animals respond to major disturbances such as hurricanes by seeking shelter, migrating, or they may fail to respond appropriately. We assessed the effects of Hurricane Irma in 2017 on the behavior and survival of juvenile bull sharks (Carcharhinus leucas) within a nursery of the Florida coastal Everglades using long-term acoustic telemetry monitoring. Most of our tagged sharks (n = 14) attempted to leave the shallow waters of the Shark River Estuary before the hurricane strike, but individuals varied in the timing and success of their movements. Eight bull sharks left within hours or days before the hurricane, but three left more than a week in advance. Nine of 11 bull sharks (~ 82%) eventually returned to the array within weeks or months of the storm. Six of these returning individuals were detected in a different coastal array in nearshore waters ca. 80 km away from the mouth of the estuary during their absence. The remaining three bull sharks moved downstream relatively late (after the hurricane) and may have died. We used binomial generalized linear mixed models to estimate the probability of presence within the array as a function of several environmental variables. Departure from the array was predicted by declining barometric pressure, increasing rate of change in pressure, and potentially fluctuations in river stage. Juvenile bull sharks may weigh multiple environmental cues, perceived predation risk, their own physical size, and shifting prey resources when making decisions during and after hurricanes.